Legal Opinion

State v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 14, 1984No. C1-83-703PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of assault in the second degree, Minn.Stat. § 609.222 (1982). The trial court sentenced defendant to 54 months in prison pursuant to section 609.11 and Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines and Commentary, II.E (1982). On appeal, defendant contends (1) that his conviction should be reversed outright because the evidence of his guilty was legally insufficient or (2) that he should be given a new trial because the trial court prejudicially erred in admitting evidence seized in a warranted search of defendant’s residence. 1 We affirm.

1.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. Eric RambisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Novak v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. State v. HagenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  5. State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API