Legal Opinion · Dissent

Connolley Ex Rel. Connolley v. Omaha Public Power District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1970No. 37257Published

1DissentSpencer, J.

I am not in agreement with the majority opinion herein, and in dissent make the following observations..

The base for the flagpole was constructed on and 3.15 feet from the east lot line of the property. The defendant owned, maintained, and operated an electrical distribution line on North Seventy-eighth Street in Omaha, Nebraska, which runs north and south in the parkway along the east side of the Connolley property but has no connection to that property. The west wire of said line is conceded to be .54 feet into the Connolley property. For the purposes of this case, it must be conceded that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kopka v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Henderson v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Bouillon v. Laclede Gas Light Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Card v. Wenatchee Valley Gas & Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Keesecker v. G. M. McKelvey Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API