Legal Opinion

Hudson Royal Restaurant, Inc. v. Mayor of Jersey City

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 3, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The relator holds a rule requiring the respondents to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not be awarded to the relator comman,ding the respondents to issue to the relator a license “to permit the playing of music and dancing by patrons at premises conducted as a restaurant by the Hudson Eoyal Eestaurant, Incorporated, on the second floor of premises known as 912 Bergen avenue, in the city of Jersey City, Hew Jersey.”

Testimony taken pursuant to the rule and the record discloses that the mayor and aldermen of Jersey City, after hearing the matter determined that to grant it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. De Roos v. ChapmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Resciniti v. Board Commissioners of BellevilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  2. Anton's, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Adams Theatre Co. v. KeenanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API