Legal Opinion
De Roos v. Chapman
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 29, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Trenchard, J.
This is a rule to show cause, obtained by the relator, directed to the township committee and to the township, requiring them to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue commanding them to issue a license to the relator to conduct a restaurant business on the premises owned by him in the township.
It appears that on December 28th, 1928, De Eoos, the relator, applied to the township committee for a license to operate a restaurant in a two and one-half story building on land owned by him. The application was made pursuant to the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of Recycling & Salvage Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- John R. Thompson Co., Inc. v. District of Columbia. District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Resciniti v. Board Commissioners of BellevilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Belleville Chamber of Commerce v. Town of BellevilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Hudson Royal Restaurant, Inc. v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.