Legal Opinion

Salazar v. Hi-Land Potato Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1996No. 95CA1787PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*327Opinion by

Judge CRISWELL.

In this workers’ compensation case, petitioner, Kenneth Salazar (claimant), seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel (Panel) which reversed an order of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and allowed respondents, Hi-Land Potato Company and Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority, to suspend payment of his “medical impairment benefits” for the weeks he was incarcerated on a misdemeanor conviction. We affirm.

At issue in this appeal is whether the suspension of such benefits was mandated by § 8-42-113(1), C.R.S. (1995 Cum.Supp.), which provides…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Duran v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. COLORADO AFL-CIO v. DonlonColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Wood v. Beatrice Foods Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. City of Thornton v. ReplogleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. Durocher v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City & County of Denver v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API