Lori Byrd Martin v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party Foster Forbes Glass Company, Third-Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Per curiam
In this diversity negligence case we are asked to determine whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the jury verdict, whether the district court erred in its instructions to the jury, and whether it erred in refusing to give rebuttal argument to one of the defendants. We find no error on the part of the district court and we find there is a rational basis in the record for the jury’s verdict. Accordingly, we affirm.
Mrs. Lori Byrd Martin was severely injured in her right eye when a bottle of cologne exploded. Mrs. Martin initially sued Chesebrough, the bottler and seller of the spray…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. And Cosmair, Inc. v. Edd Pruitt and Marjorie Ann PruittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Mrs. Harvey Stancill v. McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc., and Carriers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Giffin v. EnsignCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Bob McBrayer v. Teckla, Inc., Water Wagon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jacques Moreau v. Egon Oppenheim v. Virginia H. Zimmerman, Intervenor-Appellee. Alduro-Raynes Arabians, Inc. v. Jacques MoreauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. John Labatt Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Fernandez v. Corporacion Insular De SegurosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Jonas v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- L-3 Communications Corp. v. OSI Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.