Legal Opinion

Dempsey v. HUSKEY

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 8, 1954No. 16830PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Order of Judge Littlejohn follows:

This matter came to be heard before me at Chambers at Spartanburg on Tuesday, January 13, 1953, as a result of exceptions filed by the plaintiff to the report of the special referee, and as a result of exceptions filed by the defendants Martha S. Huskey and Cecil G. Huskey, grounds for which exceptions will appear more fully by reference to the instruments filed by counsel in the case, both of which are of record.

A summary of the testimony in this case reveals that the plaintiff, Bertha Dempsey, on November 8, 1947, agreed to purchase a house and lot from…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Premium Investment Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Simonds v. SimondsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Goolsby v. GoolsbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  4. Lewis v. Premium Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  5. In Re JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API