Legal Opinion

The Golden Rod

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 31, 1912Published

In Admiralty. Suit for collision by the C. F. Harms Company, as owner of the barge Crow, against the steam tugs Golden Rod and Transfer No. 20. Decree for libelant against the Golden Rod alone.

1Opinion of the Court

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

[1] The libelant is the owner of a barge which, without fault on its part, was injured! while in tow of the tug Golden Rod by collision with a float, then being towed on the port side of the tug Transfer No. 20, in Hell Gate, upon the 15th day of January, 1911. There being no fault on the part of the barge, and the Golden Rod and Transfer having both been brought in, the case develops into charges of fault by the Golden Rod against the Transfer, and counter charges by the Transfer against the Golden Rod.

A difficult question of fact arises. The tide was running ebb,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Duluth S. S. Co. v. Pittsburg S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  3. United States v. Erie R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API