Legal Opinion

Duluth S. S. Co. v. Pittsburg S. S. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 13, 1910No. 2,027PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. Suit in admiralty by the Pittsburg Steamship Company against the ’Duluth Steamship Company, and cross-libel. Decree for ’libelant, and :respondent appeals. This is a libel in admiralty of the Pittsburgh Steamship Company against the Duluth Steamship Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, growing out of a collision of two vessels.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. Suit in admiralty by the Pittsburg Steamship Company against the ’Duluth Steamship Company, and cross-libel. Decree for ’libelant, and :respondent appeals. This is a libel in admiralty of the Pittsburgh Steamship Company against the Duluth Steamship Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, growing out of a collision of two vessels. The libel, the answer thereto, and a cross-libel were filed. Much evidence was taken in the form of depositions, and the case was heard…

1Opinion of the CourtMcCALL, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). When these colliding vessels became factors in their proper navigation in relation to each other, it was their plain duty to have reached a passing agreement by the exchange of signals for that purpose. But this they failed to do. The Sylvania introduces evidence tending to show that she attempted to establish an agreement with the Bessemer to pass starboard to starboard from the time that she picked up the lights of the Bessemer until the collision became imminent, and had soundéd a two-blast signal for that purpose three times, but received no response…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Lake Erie Transp. Co. v. Gilchrist Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  3. The WenonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Hall v. ChisholmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  5. Elphicke v. Pittsburgh Steamship Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eastern S. S. Co. v. International Harvester Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
  2. The VirginianDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
  3. The Golden RodDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API