Legal Opinion

Stodden v. Anderson & Winter Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 7, 1908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Clinton District Court.— Hon. A. P. Barker, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for a personal injury. There was a directed verdict in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

The defendant is a corporation engaged in operating a furniture factory in the city of Clinton, this State. At the time of the accident out of which grew the injury of which complaint is made, plaintiff was in the employ of defendant as a workman in its factory. The accident occurred in connection with the use by plaintiff of a machine called a “ joiner,” and the injury consisted in the loss of the fingers of his left hand. As matters of negligence on the part of defendant, it is alleged — stated generally — 'that the joiner was out of repair, and that it was not furnished with a guard to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCarthy ex rel. Jennings v. MulgrewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. McCue v. National Starch Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Haskell v. L. H. Kurtz Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. Holliday v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Waddell ex rel. Hambrecht v. Burlington Basket Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Blackman v. Western Electric Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Bork v. Keller Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API