Legal Opinion

Miller v. Inglis

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 1997No. Docket 176855PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.

i

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

Defendants operated their respective vehicles while under the influence of alcohol, collided with plaintiffs police car, and injured plaintiff, a Warren police officer. The issue raised is whether an intoxicated driver who causes injury to a police officer is consid ered to have engaged in conduct that is sufficiently wilful and wanton to fall within the “wilful and wanton” exception to the “fireman’s rule.” Plaintiff settled with defendant Bock, and the trial court granted defendant Inglis’ motion pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8) (failure to state a claim) for summary…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Jennings v. SouthwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Kreski v. Modern Wholesale Electric Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Dacon v. TransueMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. LardieMichigan Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lamp v. ReynoldsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Taylor v. LabanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. ISB Sales Co. v. Dave's CakesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Saginaw County v. John Sexton Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Michigan Township Participating Plan v. Federal InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API