Legal Opinion

Dubroc v. Dubroc

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 2017No. WD 80315PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICTOR C. HOWARD, JUDGE

Sandra Dubroc appeal's the trial court’s amended judgment of dissolution of marriage. Because of significant deficiencies in Ms. Dubroc’s appellate brief, the appeal is dismissed.

Ms. Dubroc appeals pro se. Pro se appellants are held to the same standards as lawyers. J.L. v. Lancaster, 453 S.W.3d 348, 350 (Mo. App. W.D. 2015). Although this court is mindful of the difficulties that a party appearing pro se encounters in complying with rules of procedure, pro se appellants must be required tp comply with these rules. Id. “It is not for lack of sympathy, but rather is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lattimer v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Paula Fesenmeyer v. Land Bank of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Jacqueline Lancaster v. Marc LancasterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Kratzer v. KratzerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. KingMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Aziz v. TsevisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API