Jacqueline Lancaster v. Marc Lancaster

VICTOR C. HOWARD, JUDGE

Marc Lancaster appeals the trial court’s judgment granting J.L. a full order of protection. Because of Lancaster’s failure to substantially comply with the requirements of Rules 84.04 and 81.12, J.L.’s mo tion to dismiss the appeal is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

Lancaster appears pro se. Pro se appellants are held to the same standards as attorneys. Duncan-Anderson v. Duncan, 321 S.W.3d 498, 499 (Mo.App.E.D.2010). “Although we are mindful of the difficulties that a party appearing pro se encounters in complying with the rules of procedure, we must require pro se…