Legal Opinion
Tracy v. State Ex Rel. Fancher
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 25, 1916No. 7261PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Error from District Court. Hughes County; Geo. O. Crump, Judge. Action by the State, on relation of Tom H. Fnncher, County Attorney of Hughes County, against W. E. Tracy, and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
COLLIER, C.
This is an action by the defendant in error against plaintiffs in error to recover upon a forfeited bond. The parties hereafter will be designated as they were in the trial court.
In the brief of plaintiff in error it is said:
“It is not intended that this cause should be reversed as to any other of the plaintiffs in error except as to Mat Wolf. Hence the only question involved in this appeal is as to the legality of the judgment rendered against said Mat Wolf, one of the defendants in the court below. Summons was issued to Mat Wolf, which was subsequently quashed, and an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seifert v. HoltSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Bigsby v. EppsteinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Stout v. CalverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1840
- Washington Savage v. DinklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Union Brewing Co. v. CooperColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pulaski Oil Co. v. ConnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Boulter v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Baker v. Hunt & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Ross v. IrvingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.