Legal Opinion
Wenderhold v. Cylink Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 3, 1999No. Nos. C 98-4292 VRW, C 98-4-296 VRW, C 98-4360 VRW, C 98-4536 VRW, C 98-4603 VRW, C 98-4673 VRW, C 98-4757 VRWPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, District Judge.
The above are seven related securities class actions filed against Cylink Corporation and certain of its officers and directors. The plaintiffs in each of these actions allege violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), 17 CFR § 240.10b-5. The purported class consists of purchasers of Cylink common stock during various class periods. Some of the named plaintiffs in the seven cases along with two purported class members who have not filed complaints seek as a group to be designated lead plaintiffs (Cylink Shareholder Group)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re Olsten Corp. Securities Litig.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- In re Oxford Health Plans Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- In re Donnkenny Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- In re Cendant Corp. LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re: Cendant Corporation LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- In Re Network Associates, Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999
- Aronson v. McKesson HBOC, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1999
- In re Lucent Technologies, Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Zhu v. UCBH Holdings, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.