Legal Opinion

Allen v. Travelers Insurance Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1964No. 6166PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LOTTINGER, Judge.

Following our overruling of defendants’ exceptions of no cause of action and remand to the Lower Court, (See 124 So.2d 367), the matter was heard on its merits. Judgment was rendered sustaining a plea of prescription adversely to the plaintiff and he has appealed. It is not necessary to discuss the plea of prescription because as we view the case, same can be disposed of on the merits.

It will be remembered from our first opinion herein that we concluded that plaintiff’s employer, Ourso & Company, was engaged in a non-hazardous business and, further, that plaintiff was injured…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Allen v. Travelers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Mercer v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Kramer v. EtieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API