Legal Opinion
Mercer v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 9, 1963No. 813PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAVOY, Judge.
This suit was brought by plaintiff against her employer to recover compensation, medical expenses, penalties and attorneys’ fees under the Workmen’s Compensation Act because of an injury received by her while in the course and scope of her employment in February of 1961.
*114Defendant filed a general denial and further answered the petition stating (1) that its business was not hazardous as defined by LSA-R.S. 23 :1021 et seq.; (2) that plaintiff did not perform any hazardous duties, and therefore, the above sections of the Workmen’s Compensation Act were not applicable to her; (3)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Byas v. Hotel Bentley, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Viator v. New Hotel Monteleone, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Boggs v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fontenot v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Kramer v. EtieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Allen v. Travelers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Bolton v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Mercer v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1963