Legal Opinion

Shlomchik v. Retirement Plan of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1980No. Civ. A. 80-1897PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WEINER, District Judge.

This is an action for accrued pension benefits allegedly due plaintiff under the Retirement Plan of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund (Fund), brought pursuant to Section 502(a)(1)(A) and (B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(A) and (B). Plaintiff also seeks, pursuant to Section 502(c) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(c), award of statutory penalty of $100.00 per day for each day that defendants allegedly failed to provide plaintiff with a copy of the Plan, in accordance with Section 104(b)(4) of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. A. L. Black v. Acme Markets, Inc., First National Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  3. Oxford First Corp. v. PNC Liquidating Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Pollock v. CastrovinciDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  5. Fitzsimmons v. BartonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In Re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefit "Erisa" Litigation, Unisys CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Curry v. Contract Fabricators Inc. Profit Sharing PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Porcellini v. Strassheim Printing Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Paris v. F. Korbel & Bros., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
  5. Wesley v. Monsanto Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API