Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 11, 1986No. 84-080; No. 84-317; No. 85-051PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.

The defendant was convicted in the Superior Court {Contas, J.) of felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:3 (Supp. 1985). Thereafter Contas, J., denied his motion for new trial, and Temple, J., denied his petition for writ of habeas corpus based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. In these combined appeals, we do not reach the issues raised by the denials of post-trial relief, because we reverse the conviction for failure to afford the defendant the hearing to which he was entitled under State v. Howard, 121 N.H. 53, 426 A.2d 457 (1981).

The trial record indicates that the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. HowardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. State v. MiskellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BudisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  2. State v. JacquesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  3. State v. FennellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  4. State v. DeanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  5. State v. BudisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API