Legal Opinion
State v. Armstrong
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1924No. 2947Published
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
WATSON, J.
Because of the circumstance mentioned in the foregoing concurring opinion, the court did not have opportunity in this case for that mature consideration and deliberation which its importance merits. Por that reason, and because of the changed personnel of the court, a full rehearing and reconsideration were deemed proper.
The most important question presented is whether sections 1 and 2, c. 118, Laws of 1923, whereby the Legislature attempted to adopt as the law of this state the penal provisions of the National Prohibition Act (U. S. Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, §…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- National Prohibition CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- People Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners v. BanksNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Commonwealth v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.