Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Salisbury v. . Arey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 3, 1944Published
1ConcurrenceWinborne, J.
BARNHILL, J., joins in concurring opinion. The pertinent parts of the agreed statement of facts, submitted to the court below for the determination of the questions involved in this action, are as follows:
"I. That the plaintiff is a municipal corporation, duly chartered, organized and existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina.
"II. That, pursuant to Section 6, Chapter 56, Public Laws of 1915, now C. S., 2708, the governing body of plaintiff, on May 5, 1925, passed an original resolution providing for certain street paving improvements and the manner of payment of the assessment…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Renshaw v. Missouri State Mutual Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Charlotte v. . KavanaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Gallimore v. Town of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Bacon v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- City of Middlesboro v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.