Legal Opinion

City of Middlesboro v. Terrell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 11, 1934PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Richardson

Reversing.

The city of Middlesboro, a city of the third class, in accordance with the authority conferred upon it by section 3458, Kentucky Statutes, adopted ordinances, the regularity of which is not disputed, for the construction of the street, at the expense of the abutting-property owners, fronting lots Nos. 31-33, block No. 506, section northeast, owned by “Charles Terrell and wife.”

After it was constructed, accepted, and approved, by the city’s legislative body, within the time fixed by the statute, they exercised the option accorded them by section…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Malone v. MeresSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  3. Broadway Baptist Church v. McAteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871
  4. City of Covington v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  5. City of Mt. Sterling v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Smith v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  3. City of Louisa v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  4. City of Olive Hill v. GearhartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  5. City of Corbin v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API