Legal Opinion
Pittman v. Hunt Construction Group
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided June 26, 2008No. 5:07-mj-00001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES C. DEVER III, District Judge.
On January 8, 2007, Plaintiff Eddie LaReece Pittman (“Pittman” or “plaintiff’) filed this Title VII action against defendants Hunt Construction Group (“Hunt Construction”), Billy Stewart (“Stewart”), and Chris Armstrong (“Armstrong”) (collectively, “defendants”). On June 18, 2007, the court entered an order [D.E. 22] granting defendants’ motion to dismiss Stewart and Armstrong as defendants. Consequently, only Hunt Construction remained as a defendant in this case.
On March 28, 2008, Hunt Construction moved for summary judgment. Plaintiff responded on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shepherd v. Coastal Community Action, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2009
- Pittman v. Hunt Construction GroupCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Pittman v. Hunt Construction GroupCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009