Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 26, 1979No. 28455PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

After a preliminary hearing, defendants Mary Elizabeth Hicks and Tangier Eileen Billingsley were bound over to the district court for trial on charges of attempted theft (section 18-2-101, C.R.S. 1973 (1976 Supp.)), theft (section 18-4-401, C.R.S. 1973 (1976 Supp.)), and conspiracy (section 18-2-201, C.R.S. 1973 (1976 Supp.)). The defendants moved to suppress evidence which was seized in a warrantless search of a pickup truck. The women were in the truck enroute to Denver when the truck was stopped and an arrest was made. The district court granted the motion to suppress.

The district attorney…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. State v. OppermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. HausemanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. People v. BertineSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. People v. BannisterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. People v. BrownColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. People v. BannisterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API