Legal Opinion

People v. Bannister

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 10, 1980No. 79SA556PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSON, Justice.

This case is again before us for proceedings not inconsistent with Colorado v. Bannister, — U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 42, 66 L.Ed.2d 142 (1980). In People v. Bannister, Colo., 607 P.2d 978 (1980), we suppressed evidence seized from Peter Rodney Bannister’s automobile in an attempt to comply with the directions contained in Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753, 99 S.Ct. 2586, 61 L.Ed.2d 235 (1979).

The Supreme Court of the United States, in its reversal, determined that Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970) and Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 45…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. GableColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. BrownColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API