Male v. Harlan
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, Meado county. Hon. A. J. Plowman. Judge. Action by William H. Male and others against James E. Harlan and others. The plaintiffs appeal from that part of the decree which was adverse to them.
1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.
This was an action to foreclose a real estate mortgage. James E. Harlan was made defendant for the reason that he held a certificate on a tax sale made of the property included in the mortgage, which the plaintiffs claimed was sub*628ject and subsequent to the mortgage. Harlan claimed that the tax certificate was a prior and paramount lieu upon the property. The judgment or decree was in the usual form, decreeing the sale of the mortgaged property, and that all and each of the defendants be forever barred and foreclosed of all right, title, interest, and equity of redemption in and to the said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alexander v. . AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Grunberg v. BlumenlahlCity of New York Municipal Court · 1883
- Goodlett v. St. Elmo Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Sperry v. HillmanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ottenheimer v. Mountain States Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1920
- Cottier v. SullivanWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
- Bohl v. BohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- Pierson v. Minnehaha CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Belle Fourche Valley Ry. v. Belle Fourche Land & Cattle Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.