Legal Opinion
Lewandowski v. Donohue Intelligraphics, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 9, 1994No. 2218-MPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dickinson, Judge.
Defendant Donohue Intelligraphics, Inc. has appealed from the denial of a motion for relief from judgment it filed in the Medina County Court of Common Pleas pursuant to Civ.R. 60(B). By its motion, defendant sought to have a cognovit judgment against it vacated. It has argued that the trial court, abused its discretion by denying that motion because (1) it presented a meritorious defense to the claim against it by showing that the amount of the judgment entered pursuant to the cognovit provision had been incorrectly calculated; (2) the trial court did not have jurisdiction…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Meyers v. McGuireOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Mirman v. WebsterOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by9 opinions
- First Natl. Bank of Pandora v. Freed, Unpublished Decision (7-6-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Your Financial Community of Ohio, Inc. v. EmerickOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Bates v. Midland Title of Ashtabula Co., Unpublished Decision (11-26-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Saponari v. Century Limousine Service, Unpublished Decision (12-4-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
- PC Surveillance.Net, L.L.C. v. Rika Group, Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.