Legal Opinion

Mirman v. Webster

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1934No. 2403PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*328OPINION

By PUNK, J.

It will be noted that , this is not an action, on a note, but is a special proceeding under chapter 6 of division IV of title IV of part third, of the' General Code, being §§11631 et seq., GC, to vacate a judgment after term.

It will be further noted that, in such special proceedings, the burden is upon the party asking the vacation of the judgment, to show to the court that; at least one of the ten grounds upon which a judgment may be vacated after the term, .as set forth in said §11631 GC exists. The only ground upon which plaintiff in error asked that the judgment be…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meyers v. McGuireOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Lewandowski v. Donohue Intelligraphics, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API