Legal Opinion

United States v. One Ford 198X Mustang, Vehicle Identification No. 1FAB42E5JF290177

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 23, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-2865-YPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YOUNG, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

The plaintiff United States brings this forfeiture claim against the defendant 198X Mustang VIN 1FAB42E5JF290177 (“Mustang”) before this Court pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(4), which reads as follows:(a) The following shall be subject to forfeiture to the United States and no property right shall exist in them:(1) All controlled substances which have been manufactured, distributed, dispensed, or acquired in violation of this subchapter.(2) All raw materials, products, and equipment of any kind which are used, or intended for use, in…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. PayneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  2. United States v. CaronDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  3. United States v. SchiavoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  4. Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API