Legal Opinion

McDonnell v. Merrill

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 2, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Transferred from the April term, 1919, of the superior court, by Marble, J.

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Counsel for the defendants in argument made the following statement to which the plaintiff excepted: “Well, if Mr. Merrill is liable in this case, it is an awful pity before he went to farming he didn’t work out for somebody and take no risk; it is an awful pity that he didn’t sell his farm before the accident happened, for if he is liable in this case he is mortgaged forever.”

There was no evidence as to the financial condition of the defendants. If such evidence had been proffered it would have been rejected as incompetent. If the defendants had been found liable for an amount that would…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Caverhill v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  2. Lemay v. DemersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campen v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. KetchenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921
  3. Duplessis v. GuyonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  4. Chapman v. LeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  5. Campen v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API