Caverhill v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
Parsons, C. J.-
By the federal statute whose application to the case is understood to be conceded, the defendants, common carriers by railroad, were made liable, “while engaging in commerce between any of the several states, ... to any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in such concern, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative, . . . such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier.” 35 U. S. Stat., p. 65, s. 1.
There was evidence that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bullard v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886
- Story v. Concord & Montreal RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
3Cited by8 opinions
- Archibald v. Northern Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Byram v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- State v. KetchenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921
- Reed v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- McDonnell v. MerrillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.