Legal Opinion

Wright v. Board of Psychological Examiners

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2010No. 35647PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court on a petition for judicial review of agency action. The district court held that the appellant could not challenge an earlier final order of the agency and it upheld the subsequent final order. We affirm the first holding and reverse the second.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Dr. Eileen Wright was licensed to practice psychology in Idaho on February 1, 1995, and she began working in private practice as a psychologist in 1998. On December 10, 1999, the judge presiding over a contentious *544domestic relations case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Myers v. Workmen's Auto InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Callaghan v. CallaghanIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Welch v. Del Monte Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Keller v. Inland Metals All Weather Conditioning, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clear Springs Foods, Inc. v. SpackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Syringa Networks, LLC v. Idaho Department of AdministrationIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Elias-Cruz v. Idaho Department of TransportationIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In Re Distribution of Water to Various Water RightsIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. South Valley Ground Water v. ID Dept of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API