Legal Opinion

Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 2009No. 36078-2009PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by a mother from the district court’s affirmance of a judgment terminating her parental rights in her child. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On May 16, 2004, Jane Doe (Mother) gave birth to a son (Child). Both of them tested positive for methamphetamine. Two days later, Child was declared in imminent danger and taken into custody. On May 19, 2004, the Department of Health and Welfare filed a petition under the Child Protective Act seeking custody, or alternatively protective supervision, of Child. A shelter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bonner County v. Kootenai Hospital DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re Daniel W.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. BORLEY v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Department of Health and Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Lake CDA Investment, LLC v. Idaho Department of LandsIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Wright v. Board of Psychological ExaminersIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Manwaring Investments, L.C. v. City of BlackfootIdaho Supreme Court · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API