Dickson v. Lewandowski
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Per Curiam,
This is an appeal by an additional defendant from the lower court’s judgment in a negligence action for personal injuries. It is the appellant’s contention that the judgment of the court should have been against the original defendant, with judgment over against the appellant in favor of the original defendant for an amount paid by the original defendant in excess of his pro rata share of the verdict. The appellees, plaintiffs below, *287contend tliat the judgment of the court against both defendants in favor of the appellees should be affirmed. We remand to the lower court for…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. Keystone InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- DICKSON v. LEWANDOWSKISuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Boyle v. SteimanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Boyle v. SteimanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993