Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Keystone Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 1982No. 187PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the appellants’ complaint for failure to comply with the so-called “240 Day Rule” and Philadelphia R.Civ.P. 151. 1 The appellants contend that the lower court abused its discretion in entering the order. We vacate and remand.

The procedural history of this case is as follows: Appellants filed their complaint on December 3,1979. An answer, new matter and counterclaim were filed by the appellee on January 16, 1980. Preliminary objections to the answer, new matter and counterclaim were filed by the appellants on January 18, 1980.

On January…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pawol v. PawolSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Anmuth v. ChaganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Dickson v. LewandowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Drakes Mills Development Co. v. Northwest Pennsylvania Bank & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Barner v. BarnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Ritter v. RitterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Boden v. TompkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Fratangelo v. FratangeloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Maginley v. Robert J. Elliott, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API