Legal Opinion

Baierl v. McTaggart

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 8, 2000No. 98-3329PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurley, J.

¶ 1. Robert J. Baierl, d/b/a Supreme Builders (Baierl), appeals from a judgment requiring Baierl to pay $4,484.94 to John and Susan McTaggart (McTaggarts). In this landlord-tenant dispute, the trial court granted summary judgment to the McTaggarts, the tenants, and after finding that the lease was void, ordered Baierl, the landlord, to pay twice the security deposit less some expenses to the McTaggarts. Baierl argues that the trial court erred in ruling that: (1) an *557addendum to Baierl's lease, which contained a prohibited clause under the Wisconsin Administrative Code, voided the entire…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Simenstad v. HagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Strassman v. MuranyiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  4. Marshall v. WittigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Campi v. Seven Haven Realty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beneficial Hawaii, Inc. v. KidaHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Baierl v. McTaggartWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Baierl v. McTaggartWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Baierl v. McTaggartCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  5. Beneficial Hawaii, Inc. v. KidaHawaii Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API