Legal Opinion

Isely v. Wilkins

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 24, 1969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON POST JUDGMENT MOTIONS AND REQUEST FOR REMAND

WEBBER, Justice.

Plaintiffs brought an action for breach of warranty and negligence based upon the use of a defective “frosting cap” in defendant Wilkins’ beauty parlor. Defendant Wilkins in turn sued Maine Beauty for breach of warranty and Maine Beauty then sued supplier Select on the same ground. A jury awarded plaintiffs $32,500 as for breach of warranty and gave successive verdicts for the same amount to each 3rd party plaintiff so that ultimate damage responsibility fell upon Select. Plaintiffs have not appealed nor has Select. Select…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mary Schaaff Greear v. James N. Greear, Jr., and Margaret Sperry GreearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. White v. SchofieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wescott v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Ginn v. Penobscot CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  3. Erickson v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. Bancroft & Martin v. LOCAL NO. 340, ETC.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  5. Erickson v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API