Legal Opinion

Mary Schaaff Greear v. James N. Greear, Jr., and Margaret Sperry Greear

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 29, 1961No. 17272-17274PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant in these consolidated appeals has moved this court for an order remanding the consolidated record to the district court. The purpose of such remand is so that court may reconsider certain motions, the orders on which are the subject of these appeals, in the light of depositions which through asserted inadvertence were not of record before the district court when such orders were entered.

We regard the motion made in this court as in substance one to remand so that the district court may entertain a motion made under rule 60(b)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. PollinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  2. Roy Ferrell v. Trailmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. Binks Manufacturing Company, Etc. v. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Charles L. Corn v. Guam Coral Company, Inc., Panciteria Far East, Inc. v. Guam Coral Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Smith v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. Aune v. ReyndersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  4. 16 soc.sec.rep.ser. 116, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 17,074 Jeanne A. Jordan v. Otis T. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. Smith v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API