Legal Opinion
G. M. C. Process Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur G. Klein, J.
This case was tried before me without a jury, both sides waiving formal findings of fact.
In September, 1954, the plaintiff commenced an action in this court against Joseph Garofano, James Garofano and Patrick Garofano to enjoin the breach of a contract in which the Garofano s agreed, among other things, not to use a certain patented process purchased by the plaintiff from Joseph Garofano. Costs, and an accounting for profits and damages caused by the wrongr ful use of the patented process were also demanded. After trial, Mr. Justice Matthew M. Levy decided in favor of the plaintiff and an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moran v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Wilson Sullivan Co. v. International Paper Makers Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Goodwin v. . BunzlNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Sklar & Cohen Woodworking Co. v. OwenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Carl v. MeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Spice N Nice, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- City of New York v. Britestarr Homes, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1991
- G. M. C. Process Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1961