Legal Opinion

Adams v. Harris

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 2024No. 2023-0733PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 176 Ohio St.3d 697.] ADAMS ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES, v. HARRIS, TAX COMMR., APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT. [Cite as Adams v. Harris,

2024-Ohio-4640.] Taxation—Real-property tax—Current-agricultural-use valuation—Tax commissioner abused her discretion by unreasonably and arbitrarily adopting $1,000 per acre woodland-clearing-cost rate—Decision of Board of Tax Appeals reversed and cause remanded to tax commissioner with instructions that she adopt woodland-clearing-cost rate that complies with Adm.Code 5703-25-33. (No.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Arbino v. Johnson & JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State ex rel. Steele v. MorrisseyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Ohio Civ. Serv. Emps. Assn. v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. City of Dayton, ex rel. Scandrick v. City of Dayton Mayor McGeeOhio Supreme Court · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adams v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API