Legal Opinion

Schmutzler v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1951No. File No. 7218PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimson, J.

On August 15, 1947, Lawrence Schmutzler, the plaintiff herein, was working as a salesman for Sears, Roebuck & Company at Minot, North Dakota. That company had then in all things complied with the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. In the course of plaintiff’s employment that day he suffered an injury to his right eye which resulted in the removal of the eyeball on Sept. 24, 1947. At the time of the injury plaintiff was receiving an average wage of $85.00 per week. On Nov. 24, 1947, the Workmen’s Compensation Bureau awarded plaintiff compensation for temporary, total disability,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. United States v. RyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. BroderickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State v. PraterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Braun v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Clayburgh v. American West Community Promotions, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hutchinson v. CharlesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  3. In Re Johnson's EstateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State Ex Rel. Clayburgh v. American West Community Promotions, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State Ex Rel. Clayburgh v. American West Community Promotions, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API