Legal Opinion

Scott v. Grinnell

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 31, 1960No. 4817PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lampeón, J.

The plaintiff admits that the promises made to her by the decedent were oral, unless the documentary evidence in the possession of the executor and sought by her motion for discovery contains written confirmation of such promises. It is also conceded that decedent’s estate consists only of personal property of a value in excess of $500 so that plaintiff’s action is governed by the provisions of RSA 346:4. “A contract to will personalty of a greater value than $500 must be in writing unless there has been such payment as removes the case from the provisions of the uniform sales…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wolfle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States v. Walter F. Tellier, Albert Joseph Proctor, Elton B. Jones and Alaska Telephone CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  3. Drew v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Collins v. UtleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  5. McGlone v. FairchildWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Local 3-677Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mayorga v. TateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. State v. LaRocheSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. Stevens v. ThurstonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. Higgins v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Local 3-677Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API