Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Local 3-677

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

811 S.W.2d 875 (1991)

Alvin HIGGINS, Gerald Briggs, Wesley Banks, Christopher Ledford, Carmel Burleson, and John Conley, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

OIL, CHEMICAL AND ATOMIC WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL # 3-677, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Knoxville.

June 3, 1991.

Judith Fain, Erwin, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Cecil D. Branstetter, Branch H. Henard, III, Nashville, Michael J. Davenport, Johnson City, for defendant-appellant.

OPINION

DAUGHTREY, Justice.

This lawsuit involves an action in contract, brought by six former employees of Nuclear Fuel Services Company (NFS) against…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Petty v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Johnson v. Central National Ins. Co. of Omaha, Neb.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Higgins v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Local 3-677Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. IngramTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re the Estate of MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API