Legal Opinion

Rohrbaugh v. Astrue

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 5, 2008No. Civil Action 06-783-JJFPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FARNAN, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is an appeal pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) filed by Plaintiff, Renee Rohr-baugh, seeking review of the final administrative decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), respectively. 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433; 1381-1383f. Plaintiff has filed a Motion For Summary Judgment (D.I. 10) requesting the Court to enter judgment…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Evelyn Plummer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. Tommaso Fargnoli v. Larry G. Massanari, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. Deborah Kent v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API