Legal Opinion
Hunter v. Paxton
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 22, 1934No. Docket No. 1288PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
In support of their motion to dismiss the appeal herein for failure of the appellant to file a transcript of the record within the prescribed time, respondents have presented the certificate of the county clerk as required by Rule VI of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal. The facts stated in the certificate are uncontradicted and it therefrom appears that notice of appeal was filed on June 2, 1932; that no bill of exceptions has been filed as provided in section 650 of the Code of Civil Procedure; that no transcript prepáred in conformity with the provisions of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. NovotnyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Union Trust Co. v. NovotnyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Steffey v. Standard Stations, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ambrose v. American Toll Bridge Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. HaddanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Di Giacomo v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934