Legal Opinion
Di Giacomo v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 11, 1934No. Civ. No. 1361PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
In support of their motion to dismiss this appeal for failure of appellant to file a transcript of the record within the prescribed time, respondents have presented the certificate of the county clerk as required by Rule VI of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal. The facts stated in the certificate are uncontradicted and it appears therefrom that notice of appeal was filed on March 5, 1934; that on the same date a written request for the preparation of a transcript was filed; that no transcript has been filed pursuant to section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. NovotnyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Union Trust Co. v. NovotnyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Steffey v. Standard Stations, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Christensen v. CoueyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Hunter v. PaxtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by1 opinion
- Atlas Assurance Co. v. TunstallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938