Legal Opinion
Adams Express Co. v. Darden
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 9, 1923No. 3712PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
On July 7, 1915, while the Cummins Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act (Comp. St. § 8604a) was in force, defendant in error (whom we shall call plaintiff) delivered six horses to the Adams Express Company, at Lato'nia, Ky., for shipment to Windsor, Ontario. The horses were loaded in one end of a car furnished by the express company; the other end being occupied by seven horses owned severally by one Seamster and others. The rate charged by the express company was $165 for the car, one-half of which amount was paid by plaintiff and the other half by those who had…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Levin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Hall v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Adams Express Co. v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Dimond Rigging Co. v. BDP Int'l, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Hannigan v. Italo Petroleum Corp. of AmericaSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.