Legal Opinion

Ensor v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 31, 1999No. 81605PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Judge.

Forfeitures — proceeds of property seized by law enforcement authorities1— must be distributed to schools under the Missouri Constitution, article IX, section 7. The issue in this case is whether forfeiture proceeds can be assigned by statute to a statewide school building fund or whether the Constitution only permits a distribution of such proceeds to school districts in counties where the forfeitures occur.

In 1998, the General Assembly amended section 166.1312 to aggregate forfeiture *783proceeds from around the state into a “school building revolving fund” for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Asbury v. LombardiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Hammerschmidt v. Boone CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. Buechner v. BondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. L & K Realty Co. v. R. W. Farmer Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Reorganized School District No. 7 v. DouthitSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. City of Arnold v. TourkakisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  3. City of Arnold v. TourkakisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  4. The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. The City of Bellefontaine Neighbors, Sherrell Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  5. The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. The City of Bellefontaine Neighbors, Sherrell Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API