Legal Opinion

Harmann v. French

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1976No. 75-122PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The question on this appeal is whether the trial court properly held that the defendant, Harry R. French, failed to exercise an option to purchase the feed mill property leased to him by Victor Harmann and was holding over beyond the term of the lease, and hence was properly evicted from possession and subjected to double rent as damages for the period of holding over.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The record shows that on September 16, 1972, Har-mann as lessor and French as lessee entered into a lease agreement for a feed mill located in the city of Algoma. The lease period ran…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hafemann v. KorinekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Edlebeck v. BarnesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Raffensperger v. Van KooyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burmeister v. VondrachekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Vincenti v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API