Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramiro Infanzon

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 5, 1956No. 24050_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of perjury committed during the hearing under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in the case of United States v. Tramaglino, the decision in which, adverse to Tramaglino, was affirmed by us, 2 Cir., 234 F.2d 489. At the hearing Tramaglino offered Infanzon’s testimony as alleged evidence of government agent Olivera’s bad character and lack of credibility and of his persecution of Tramaglino. Infanzon’s testimony was therefore quite material to the inquiry; and the jury, on the basis of ample evidence, found it false.

Judge Bicks did not abuse his discretion in the circumstances of this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Eugene TramaglinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,517 United States of America v. Philip Zane, and Morton S. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. State v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. William Reece Johnston v. United States of America, (Two Cases). Fred Charles Riley v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  4. State, in Interest of GiangrossoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  5. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Ortiz TiradoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API